Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

Articles

Vol. 11 No. 2 (2022)

THE SECOND REVIEW REQUESTING CONTROVERS IN CRIMINAL CASES

DOI
https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.11.2.2022.365-384
Submitted
April 8, 2022
Published
2022-07-31

Abstract

Formally, the review can be carried out more than once, based on the Decision of the Constitutional Court (MK) No. 34/PUU-XI/2013, which states that Article 268 paragraph (3) of the Criminal Procedure Code is contrary to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and therefore has no binding force as law. This paper intends to discuss the second review's philosophical, juridical, and sociological aspects. The Supreme Court, through SEMA No. 10 of 2009 as strengthened by SEMA No. 7 of 2014, confirms that a review of more than one time is only possible if there is an object of the case there are 2 (two) or more judicial review decisions that conflict one another. The restriction on review from being submitted only once is intended to provide justice to the victim, the community, and the state. The extraordinary effort remains within a measurable corridor and does not limit access to justice for the convict.

References

Andi Zainal Abidin Farid dan AndiHamzah, Bentuk-bentuk Khusus Perwujudan Delik (Percobaan, Penyertaan dan Gabungan Delik) dan Hukum Penitensier, Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 2008.
Chairul Huda, Dari Tiada Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan menuju Kepada Tiada Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan, Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2006.
R. A. Duff, Strict Liability, “Legal Presumptions, and Presumption of Innocence”, dalam Andrew Simester (ed), Appraising Strict Liability, (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005, 125-49.
George P. Fletcher, Basic Concept of Criminal Law, New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.
George P Fletcher, Rethinking in Criminal Law, New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.
Ramiyanto, Jurnal Yudisial, ”Makna Ahli Waris sebagai Subjek Pengajukan Peninjauan Kembali”, Vol. 9 No. 1 April 2016, pp. 51-71.
Putusan MK No. 33/PUU-XIV/2016.
Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 97 PK/Pid.Susu/2012, tanggal 31 Juli 2013.
Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Selatan No. 1532/PID.B/2009/PN. JKT.SEL, tanggal 11 Februari 2010 jo Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi DKI Jakarta No. 71/PID/2010/PT. DKI, tanggal 17 Juni 2010 jo Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 1429K/Pid/2010, tanggal 21 September 2010.
Putusan Pengadilan Jakarta Selatan No. 1488/Pid.B/2008/PN. Jkt.Sel, tanggal 31 Desember 2008.
Putusan MA No. 53 PK/Pid.Sus/2019.
Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 6 PK/PID.SUS/2010.
Penetapan Pengadilan Negeri Mandailing Natal No. 31/Pid.B/2007/PN.Mdl, tanggal 26 April 2007 jo Penetapan Pengadilan Tinggi Medan No. 417/Pid/2007/PT. Mdn, tanggal 8 Oktober 2007.